Risk factors for stillbirths in Tete, Mozambique


Objective: To evaluate known risk factors for stillbirth and identify local priorities for stillbirth prevention among institutional deliveries in Tete, Mozambique.

Methods: A case–control study was conducted among 150 women who experienced stillbirths and 300 women who experienced live deliveries at three health facilities between December 1, 2009, and April 30, 2011. Case and control individuals were matched for health facility, age, and parity. Sociodemographic, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics (including HIV and syphilis serology) were assessed. Bivariate associations and a conditional logistic regression model identified variables contributing to fetal outcome.

Results: No between-group differences were recorded in the frequency of infection with HIV (25 [16.7%] cases vs 55 [18.3%] controls; P = 0.663) or syphilis (6 [4.0%] vs 16 [5.3%]; P = 0.536) at delivery. Multivariate analysis revealed that stillbirthwas associatedwith direct obstetric complications (mutually adjusted odds ratio [OR] 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6–12.1), low socioeconomic status (mutually adjusted OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1–3.1), and referral during childbirth (mutually adjusted OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.7–6.1).

Conclusion: Stillbirths in Tete,Mozambique,were predominantly caused by direct obstetric complications requiring referral among women of lowsocioeconomic status. Prenatal management of HIV and syphilis limited effects on fetal outcome. Emergency obstetric care and referral systems should be the focus of interventions aimed at stillbirth prevention.

Authors & affiliation: 
Diederike Geelhoed a,⁎, Jocelijn Stokx b, Xavier Mariano c, Carla Mosse Lázaro d, Kristien Roelens e a International Centre for Reproductive Health-Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique b Institute for Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium c Faculty of Health Science, Zambeze University, Tete, Mozambique d Tete Provincial Health Directorate-Mozambique, Tete, Mozambique e Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
Published In: 
D. Geelhoed et al. / International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 130 (2015) 148–152
Publication date: 
Monday, August 3, 2015